The Fall of John McCain: The Rabid Right Wrecks a War Hero

John McCain

Image via Wikipedia

John McCain was a bona-fide war hero. Forty years ago he was a prisoner of war in Viet Nam. John McCain was a courageous politician. Eight years ago he put his name on major campaign finance reform legislation. There was much to admire about this man. However, things seemed to have gone south for him once he began his run as the Republican candidate for President. He felt the need to appease the Rabid Right. Suddenly the maverick began to seem more like a petty, pandering politician.

Recently he has been taking up the fight to preserve “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT). It is hard for me to imagine the basis on which a person would work feverishly to keep it in place. In the past months McCain has professed that he is neither for nor against DADT, but that he wanted to wait until the military can complete it’s study and survey on the issue. He got his wish. Congress waited. But now that the report is about to come out suddenly, McCain is moving the goal post to delay the issue again.

I cannot see any reasonable legal reason that gay and lesbian citizens should not be able to serve our country by joining the military. All of the reasons I hear amount to little more than trying to accommodate other people’s prejudice. I am sorry that people are prejudiced against gays and lesbians, but if anyone should be barred from service, it would seem to make more sense to bar those who have such prejudices rather than those who are the victims of their prejudice.

Some believe that homosexuality is a sin. That is fine, and that is certainly their right. Even if we consider it as such, are we really suggesting that people who sin can’t serve? I would expect only those who want to eliminate our military to support such a policy, since anyone who thinks homosexuality is a sin also believes that we are all sinners.  Who could serve if that were the criteria?

All of the excuses why we should support DADT seem lame and they have a familiar ring to them.  How often have we heard similar hand-wringing when it comes to extending rights to all people?  This hand-wringing seems particularly silly considering the context is the military.  Here’s a guy who suffered for five years as a prisoner of war, and he’s worried that soldiers are so fragile they may not be able to handle uninvited flirting from a soldier of their same sex?  Please!  Do we really think in the culture of the military that straight soldiers might feel intimidated or harassed by their gay peers?  The military has already incorporated women into their ranks. Does anybody think that a straight soldier is likely to receive more trouble from a gay soldier than female soldiers get from their straight male peers?

The arguments against gays serving in the military seem ridiculously antiquated and un-American to me.  The arguments against gays being open about their relationships seem silly and mean-spirited.  The only reason I can imagine that he is fighting this fight is because he has bought into the Republican political strategy to sacrifice America for the sake of the Republican party by opposing everything that Obama supports regardless of its merits.  I am sorely disappointed that a man with the history of courage that John McCain has shown would join the ranks of those trying to block the abolition of DADT.

President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the 1964 Civ...

Image via Wikipedia

What many seem to refuse to acknowledge is that equal rights for homosexuals is this generation’s civil rights fight. People of my generation and certainly those from McCain’s seem to believe that it isn’t that big of a deal. We romanticize the fight for civil rights that we experienced fifty years ago. We have a list of reasons why the cause for the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-SexualTransgender) community does not rise to the same level of nobility as the cause for African-Americans. But in fifty years, it will be the fight for equal rights among the LGBT community that is romanticized.  And McCain’s actions to block it will make him appear to be a small and bigoted man.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • Jim Wheeler  On November 30, 2010 at 4:55 pm

    Obama’s critics now include those who feel he is too solemn, too thoughtful and pensive, too cerebral. In an editorial today Paul Greenberg even chastises him for not saber-rattling to deter North Korea and Iran. IMO, these critics are off the mark. I for one want a president who is stable. John McCain however is increasingly showing himself to be the opposite, doing what is politically expedient instead of sticking to principle.

    I voted for McCain because I thought he was a man of principle over partisanship. Now I regret to say that I’m glad he didn’t win. His choice for VP, which at first appeared smart, has turned out to be another expediency, flashy and superficial. John was a much better naval officer than a politician, at least lately.

    I agree with you on DADT. Society has changed, and the military has always demographically reflected that society.

  • jwhester  On November 30, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    Yes, and recent comments from Clinton make me worried that we might see saber-rattling against WikiLeaks. These days saber-rattling is the quick and easy way for administrations to improve their approval ratings.

    I have no problem with a criminal pursuit of WikiLeaks, but I worry when “terrorism” language begins to be used because that is a path towards ignoring the constitution in our pursuit of the “good.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: